2T03: 0604 London Euston to Tring
26th February 2019It is a lovely spring morning where you will be in charge of 2T03, which is the 06:04 service from London Euston to Tring. On your way there, you will call at Harrow and Wealdstone, Watford Junction, Kings Langley, Apsley, Hemel Hempstead and Berkhamsted. A great selection of AI trains have been selected for this scenario, all following the timetables of their respective TOC. Please note that details may not be perfect.
Route Used:
West Coast Mainline South 5.1
Duration:
45 minutes
Difficulty:
Easy
Requirements:
AP – Class 90 (Freightliner) Pack
AP – Class 92 Sound Pack
AP – Class 319 Electric Multiple Unit Pack Vol. 1
AP – Class 350 Enhancement Pack
AP – Mk3 Coach Sound Pack
ATS – Caledonian Sleeper Mk3A Sleeper Pack
ATS – Class 92 Caledonian Sleeper
ATS – West Coast Mainline South (v5.1)
DTG – European Loco & Asset Pack
DTG – EWS & Freightliner Class 08s Loco Add-On
DTG – EWS Class 92 Loco Add-On
DTG – London Overground Class 378 ‘Capitalstar’ EMU Add-On
DTG – Portsmouth Direct Line: London Waterloo – Portsmouth Route Add-On
DTG – South London Network Route Add-On
DTG – Virgin Trains BR Class 390 ‘Pendolino’ EMU
DTG – West Coast Main Line Over Shap Route Add-On
GreaterAngliaFanClass321 – London Overground Class 378 Aventra Prototype Refresh Reskin
Just Trains – Voyager Advanced
Just Trains – Cargowaggon Flat IGA PlusPak
superalbs – Class 377/6 and Class 377/7 Southern
Virtual District Line
Recommended:
AP – Sky and Weather Enhancement Pack
AP – Class 220/221/222 Sound Pack (Pro)
AP – Class 375/377 Sound Pack
Update Log:
V1.1 (04.03.2019): Fixed various errors, including pathing.
V1.0: (26.02.2019) Initial release.
Unfortunately I have the same AI collision problem at Harrow & Wealdstone.
Looking in the Scenario Editor, the problem seems to be the lack of “scenario specific portals” e.g. “(S) Portal 1” on my version of TS.
I have not seen this type of marker used in scenarios before and any information as to where they were obtained may be helpful to other downloaders with similar problems.
Once these were swapped in the Editor with suitable “route embedded” Portals, the scenario ran without issue.
If you (Leander) would like to look at my modified version you can email or message me.
I’m sorry to hear that! There have been some issues with custom placed portals, I will change trains to use portals embedded in the route. A new version should be available tomorrow.
Can I ask the origin of your scenario specific portals ?
As far as I know, they were included in the ‘Track Infrastructure’ for the route, but these will be changed in the next update.
As far as I know, they were included in the ‘Track Infrastructure’ for the route, but these will be changed in the next update.
I’m sorry to report that this scenario doesn’t work at my end – about 90% of the AI is incorrectly routed. I thought I’d have a crack anyway and things went swimmingly until I arrived at Harrow and Wealdstone when the scenario ended abruptly due to the collision of 1H06 and 5H07/1H07. Further investigation in the editor found most of the other services were on collision courses too. A re-download of the scenario didn’t help either. Great shame, looked like it could have been entertaining.
I will investigate this further, thank you for reporting!
I have uploaded a new version of the scenario that should resolve any issues you had. There were quite a few unseen issues, as this was my first scenario on the WCML South. The route itself tends to have incorrect pathing in and out of London Euston, but this has been resolved now.
That sounds great, I’ll give it a try this evening!
With respect, the responsibility for pathing of player and AI services lies squarely with the scenario creator. This applies to all scenarios, in all routes.