Class 350 Cab, Pass View and Destinations Patch
8th January 2019This Patch adds the correct Cab, pass view models from WCML South and Destination textures to the liveries that come with the Class 350 EP. Now also includes no passenger files courtesy of Chris Horsfield (CH Scenarios), a colour fix for the Class 350/1 and correction of the autonumbering. Note, this has meant a new folder for the Class 350/1 had to be made, for existing scenarios the 350/1s would need to be swapped in.
Requirements
Steam
Portsmouth Direct Line: London Waterloo – Portsmouth Route Add-On
WCML South: London Euston – Birmingham Route Add-On
Armstrong Powerhouse
Class 350 Enhancement Pack
Class 375/377 Enhancement Pack
Important Note on Usage in Scenarios
When using this patch Scenarios must have DTG/WCML-South activated within the Scenario Editor asset filter, failure to do so may result in the patch not working correctly. This is unfortunately a limitation within the simulator.
Changelog
V1.0 – Initial Release
V1.1 (21/08/24) – Updated preload names and Removed SWT TPWS decal from cabs
V1.2 (30/08/24) – Added New more accurate destination textures and a few new destinations
V2.0 (04/09/25) – Pack remade to use the Cab And Passenger View models from WCML-South
Hi I’m not sure if this is because I tried to install both V1 and 2 but anytime I load into quick drive (just to test it out) I get this weird flickering with no visible cab/passenger view… Are you aware of this issue? Cheers
Actually I’m not getting that flickering issue anymore but instead it doesn’t appear to work full stop? I still get the SWT logo in the cab and SWT passenger view after installing V2, not sure if I’m doing anything wrong…
no one else has reported any such issues, V1 and V2 are apply to the same files there is no reason to install V1 i only kept it downloadable for those who may not have the additional requirements added for V2,
flickering issue is a known limitation with TSCs DRM system and its usage in scenarios is already explained in the description and in the manual for the required steps, attempts have been made to make its work for quickdrive but i cannot guarantee that it will work in all quickdrive scenarios since there is too many possibilities.
otherwise all other issues you are likely down to trying to install both V1 and V2 and/or not following the installation procedure correctly and/or not having all the requirements
Yeah I fixed all that, quick drive works and most third party scenarios get it right but the default ones don’t. Tbh I don’t think AP did the 350 justice especially since they couldn’t even get the right pantograph for it lol. Anyway I left a comment on that SL 321 scenario for WCML South I was hoping you could help with
im Having some problems installing, version 2 as Windows keeps asking me that the Geomod4 file is requesting permission to use it and it just repeats itself over and over again.
yeah it does that, there’s not really anything that can be done about it apart from pressing ok until its finished
There’s an issue with your batch file installer – when extracting the cab view geos from WCMLSouthAssets.ap, you forgot to add “Assets\” before “%~dp0DTG\WCML-South\…” (should be “%~dp0Assets\DTG\WCML-South\…”) so it doesn’t extract the files.
it has been corrected
Can you also make this part for Northampton, Birmingham New Street, Rugeley Trent Valley, Crewe
what?
No – this is for when the train divides
I’ve never found any source material for such displays and the EPs implementation of the destination display wouldn’t even allow it to show correctly anyway.
E.g example:
Train divides at Northampton and the other 4 carriages to Birmingham New Street front and e.g
Train divides at Birmingham New Street as to Crewe and Rugeley T.V and Birmingham New Street
Just it would say; This train divides at Birmingham New Street
Make a Script.
Who the hell do you think you are coming on here trying to order me and make demands. I make content cause I want to and for the benefit of the community.
I certainly do NOT take orders from anyone on what it allegedly should be make especially those who appear out of the blue and show little to no respect.
Additionally your replies give me the impression you don’t know much of anything about developing for TSC, why should spend weeks of my time remaking the Desiro EPs destination system for a feature that to date I’ve literally never seen anyone else complain about. The answer is no.